Cross vs Isolated Margin: Which Should You Use?
Every crypto futures exchange asks you to pick a margin mode - cross or isolated - before you trade. The choice changes how much of your money is at risk and where you get liquidated. Here's the plain-English difference and how to decide.
Isolated margin
With isolated margin, only the margin you assign to a position can be lost. If the trade gets liquidated, that's the most you lose - the rest of your account is untouched. The trade-off is that your liquidation price sits closer to entry, because only that slice of money is backing the position.
Best for: beginners, high-conviction single trades, and anyone who wants a hard cap on the downside of one position.
Cross margin
With cross margin, your entire available balance backs the position. That pushes the liquidation price further away - a winning balance can absorb a bigger drawdown before liquidation. But the danger is real: a single runaway trade can drain your whole account, and multiple positions share the same collateral.
Best for: experienced traders hedging multiple positions, or those who actively manage margin and understand the account-wide risk.
How it affects liquidation
Margin mode directly moves your liquidation price. Our calculator uses the conservative isolated-margin estimate, which is the right default for risk planning. Whatever mode you choose, run the numbers first.
Check your liquidation price and size by risk in seconds - isolated or cross.
Open the calculators →Quick rule of thumb
- Learning, or one big trade you want to contain → isolated.
- Hedging several positions and actively managing margin → cross.
- Either way, keep leverage modest and always know your liquidation price.
Side by side - the whole difference in one table
| Isolated | Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| What backs the position | Only the margin you assigned | Your entire available balance |
| Maximum you can lose | The assigned margin | Everything in the account |
| Liquidation distance | Fixed by leverage (1/lev − MMR) | Floats - further away while balance lasts |
| One bad trade can sink others | No | Yes - it drains the shared pool |
| Best for | Directional bets, learning, high leverage | Hedged books, pros managing net exposure |
The same trade in both modes - worked example
Account: $1,000. You open a $100-margin long at 10× on BTC at $60,000 (position $1,000, liquidation math uses ~0.5% MMR).
- Isolated: liquidation sits near $54,300 (−9.5%). BTC drops 12% - you lose the $100 margin, and the remaining $900 in the account is untouched.
- Cross: the whole $1,000 backs the trade, so the SAME position survives the 12% drop - liquidation only comes near a ~99% effective drawdown of usable balance. Sounds safer, until the drop keeps going: at −25% you have silently lost $250 of account equity on a trade you "assigned" $100 to. Cross does not reduce risk - it defers the stop-out by pledging money you never consciously put at risk.
The trap in one sentence: isolated caps the damage per trade; cross quietly re-prices every open position against your whole account, and a single runaway loser can consume the margin your other positions were counting on - cascading liquidations across the book.
Which one should you use?
- Learning or trading directionally: isolated, always. The loss cap is the point. Every calculator on this site and the Paper Trade terminal models isolated for this reason.
- Hedging (long spot, short perp; or a pairs book): cross earns its keep - offsetting positions share margin efficiently and the netting is the feature.
- High leverage + cross is the account-killer combination. 50× with your whole balance as backstop means one wick decides everything at once. If you need cross, drop the leverage.
Model both with the cross-margin calculator and the isolated liquidation calculator before committing real margin.
Related guides
Reading about it only gets you so far. Rehearse it free on our terminal, then take it to a real book once it clicks.
Affiliate links. We earn a commission if you sign up; you pay the same either way.